Business Litigation

April 3, 2023 | Business Litigation

California Appellate Court Holds Trial Courts Do Not Have Discretion to Refuse to Hear a Party’s Timely Filed Motion for Summary Judgment

California Appellate Court Holds Trial Courts Do Not Have Discretion to Refuse to Hear a Party’s Timely Filed Motion for Summary JudgmentWhen a party files a motion for summary judgment within the time limits set by California Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, the party has a right to have the motion heard before the start of trial. Calendaring issues are not a basis upon which the trial court can refuse to hear a timely filed motion.
Read More

March 13, 2023 | Business Litigation

California Appellate Court Warns “Real Limits” to Specific Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Defendants in California

California Appellate Court Warns “Real Limits” to Specific Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Defendants in CaliforniaPersonal jurisdiction continues to be a surprisingly evolving area of procedural law despite the U.S. Supreme Court having first addressed it more than three quarters of a century ago in Int’l Shoe Co. v. State of Washington. 326 U.S. 310 (1945). The modern evolution of the concept has continued with important U.S. Supreme Court decisions like Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915 (2011), in 2011, Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), in 2014 and, more recently, BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell, 581 U.S. 402 (2017), in 2017. And, as more cases apply these SCOTUS decisions at the state and federal trial-court level each year, the nuances grow in California and elsewhere.
Read More

January 9, 2023 | Business Litigation

Federal Trade Commission Proposed Per Se Ban on Non-Competes in Employment Contracts

Federal Trade Commission Proposed <i>Per Se</i> Ban on Non-Competes in Employment ContractsThe proposed FTC rule would broadly ban employers from imposing non-competes on their workers. The rule, once it becomes final, would supersede California state law, which allows non-competes in limited situations, including when necessary to protect the employer’s trade secrets.
Read More

December 19, 2022 | Business Litigation

California Appellate Court Finds the Economic Loss Rule Does Not Bar Fraudulent Concealment Claims; California Supreme Court to Provide Further Guidance

California Appellate Court Finds the Economic Loss Rule Does Not Bar Fraudulent Concealment Claims; California Supreme Court to Provide Further GuidanceUnder current California law, the economic loss rule does not apply to a plaintiff’s claim for fraudulent inducement by concealment. However, the law may change as the California Supreme Court recently granted the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ request for certification of this precise question.
Read More

November 18, 2022 | Business Litigation

Liquidated Damages in Non-Consumer Contracts: Recent Guidance from Gormley v. Gonzalez

Liquidated Damages in Non-Consumer Contracts:  Recent Guidance from <i>Gormley v. Gonzalez</i>Liquidated damages provisions in non-consumer contracts are deemed valid unless the party seeking to invalidate the provision establishes that the provision was unreasonable under the circumstances existing at the time the contract was made.
Read More